Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:Find all values of the parameter (a) for which the equation (x^{2}+2x+2|x+1|=a) has exactly two solutions.

answer:We are given the equation: [x^{2} + 2x + 2|x+1| = a] and we need to find the values of the parameter (a), for which this equation has exactly two roots. To solve this, we start by considering the two cases for (|x + 1|): 1. **Case 1: (x geq -1)** In this case, (|x+1| = x+1). Substituting into the equation yields: [ x^{2} + 2x + 2(x+1) = a ] Simplifying, we get: [ x^{2} + 2x + 2x + 2 = a ] [ x^{2} + 4x + 2 = a ] [ x^{2} + 4x + 2 - a = 0 ] This is a quadratic equation in the form (Ax^2 + Bx + C = 0), where (A = 1), (B = 4), and (C = 2-a). 2. **Case 2: (x < -1)** In this case, (|x+1| = -(x+1)). Substituting into the equation yields: [ x^{2} + 2x + 2(-(x+1)) = a ] Simplifying, we get: [ x^{2} + 2x - 2x - 2 = a ] [ x^{2} - 2 = a ] [ x^{2} - a = 2 ] [ x^{2} = a + 2 ] Here, we solve for (x): [ x = pm sqrt{a + 2} ] For the quadratic equation in **Case 1** to have exactly one root, its discriminant must be zero. - The discriminant (Delta) of (x^2 + 4x + (2 - a) = 0) is given by: [ Delta = B^2 - 4AC ] [ Delta = 4^2 - 4 cdot 1 cdot (2 - a) ] [ Delta = 16 - 4(2 - a) ] [ Delta = 16 - 8 + 4a ] [ Delta = 8 + 4a ] For exactly two roots overall, this discriminant must be greater than zero and not equal, ensuring distinct roots on both ends. So we have: [ 8 + 4a = 0 ] [ 4a = -8 ] [ a = -2 ] Moving forward, ensuring there is exactly one root, for the mix of positive and negative: Upon further analyzing: Conclusion: For there to be roots separated and inclusive of: [ a > -1 ] Thus, ensuring there are two distinct roots providing: Thus, the required value of the parameter (a) is: [ boxed{a > -1} ]

question:Due to the influence of Asian sprinter Su Bingtian's brave performance in the Tokyo Olympics 100m final, where he finished fourth and broke the Asian record, three sprinters, A, B, and C, participated in a 100m race with times of T_{1}, T_{2}, and T_{3} respectively. A ran half of the time at a speed of V_{1} meters per second and the other half at a speed of V_{2} meters per second; B ran the entire race at a speed of sqrt{{V}_{1}{V}_{2}} meters per second; C ran half of the distance at a speed of V_{1} meters per second and the other half at a speed of V_{2} meters per second. Here, V_{1} gt 0, V_{2} gt 0. Which of the following conclusions must be true? A: T_{1}leqslant T_{2}leqslant T_{3} B: T_{1}geqslant T_{2}geqslant T_{3} C: {T}_{1}{T}_{3}={T}_{2}{}^{2} D: frac{1}{{T}_{1}}+frac{1}{{T}_{3}}=frac{2}{{T}_{2}}

answer:Given the problem scenario, we need to analyze the times T_{1}, T_{2}, and T_{3} for the three sprinters A, B, and C respectively, based on their speeds and how they ran the 100m race. Let's proceed step by step: 1. **Sprinter A's Time (T_{1}):** Sprinter A ran half of the time at a speed of V_{1} meters per second and the other half at V_{2} meters per second. The average speed for A can be calculated using the harmonic mean of V_{1} and V_{2} because the time is evenly split between the two speeds. Thus, the average speed of A is frac{2V_{1}V_{2}}{V_{1} + V_{2}} meters per second. Therefore, the time taken by A, T_{1}, can be calculated as: [ T_{1} = frac{100}{frac{V_{1} + V_{2}}{2}} ] 2. **Sprinter B's Time (T_{2}):** Sprinter B ran the entire race at a constant speed of sqrt{V_{1}V_{2}} meters per second. Thus, the time taken by B, T_{2}, is: [ T_{2} = frac{100}{sqrt{V_{1}V_{2}}} ] 3. **Sprinter C's Time (T_{3}):** Sprinter C ran half of the distance at V_{1} meters per second and the other half at V_{2} meters per second. The effective speed for C is the harmonic mean of V_{1} and V_{2} due to the distance being split. Therefore, the time taken by C, T_{3}, is: [ T_{3} = frac{100}{frac{2V_{1}V_{2}}{V_{1} + V_{2}}} ] 4. **Analyzing the Results:** - We know from the inequality of arithmetic and geometric means that frac{V_{1}+V_{2}}{2} geqslant sqrt{V_{1}V_{2}} geqslant frac{2V_{1}V_{2}}{V_{1}+V_{2}}. Since time is inversely proportional to speed, we can deduce that T_{1} leqslant T_{2} leqslant T_{3}. - The equality holds only when V_{1} = V_{2}, confirming choice A as correct and B as incorrect. - Additionally, since frac{V_{1} + V_{2}}{2} cdot frac{2V_{1}V_{2}}{V_{1} + V_{2}} = (sqrt{V_{1}V_{2}})^2, we can confirm that {T}_{1}{T}_{3}={T}_{2}{}^{2}, making choice C correct. - Lastly, the relationship frac{1}{{T}_{1}}+frac{1}{{T}_{3}} = frac{2}{{T}_{2}} does not hold based on our calculations, making choice D incorrect. Therefore, the correct conclusions are boxed{A} and boxed{C}.

question:Find the value of (28 * 2 + (48 / 6) ^ 2 5) * (69 / 3) + 24 * (3 ^ 2 2) in the approximate form.

answer:Let's solve the expression step by step: First, we'll solve the innermost parentheses and exponents: (28 * 2 + (48 / 6) ^ 2 - 5) * (69 / 3) + 24 * (3 ^ 2 - 2) = (28 * 2 + (8) ^ 2 - 5) * (69 / 3) + 24 * (9 - 2) Now, we'll calculate the squares and the multiplications/divisions: = (56 + 64 - 5) * (23) + 24 * (7) = (120 - 5) * 23 + 168 = 115 * 23 + 168 Now, we'll do the multiplication: = 2645 + 168 Finally, we'll add the last two numbers: = 2813 So the value of the expression in approximate form is boxed{2813} .

question:The denominators of two irreducible fractions are 600 and 700. Find the minimum value of the denominator of their sum (written as an irreducible fraction).

answer:1. **Define the fractions and their properties:** Let the two fractions be frac{a}{600} and frac{b}{700} where gcd(a,600)=1 and gcd(b,700)=1. This means that a and b are coprime with their respective denominators. 2. **Sum the fractions:** [ frac{a}{600} + frac{b}{700} = frac{700a + 600b}{600 times 700} = frac{700a + 600b}{420000} ] Simplify the numerator and denominator: [ frac{700a + 600b}{420000} = frac{7a + 6b}{4200} ] 3. **Factorize the denominator:** [ 4200 = 2^3 times 3 times 5^2 times 7 ] 4. **Determine the conditions for the numerator:** We need to find the minimum value of the denominator of the irreducible fraction frac{7a + 6b}{4200}. For this, we need to ensure that gcd(7a + 6b, 4200) is as large as possible. 5. **Use Bezout's Lemma:** By Bezout's Lemma, any integer can be expressed as 7a + 6b for some integers a and b. Let 7a + 6b = n, where n is an integer. We need to find the conditions under which n is coprime with the factors of 4200. 6. **Analyze the gcd conditions:** Since gcd(a, 600) = 1 and gcd(b, 700) = 1, it follows that gcd(n, 6) = 1 and gcd(n, 7) = 1. This means that n cannot be divisible by 2, 3, or 7. 7. **Determine the maximum gcd:** The maximum possible gcd of 4200 and n is 25, since n must be coprime with 2, 3, and 7. Therefore, the minimum denominator of frac{7a + 6b}{4200} = frac{n}{4200} is: [ frac{4200}{25} = 168 ] 8. **Verify the solution:** A denominator of 168 is satisfied by choosing a = 25 and b = -25, since: [ 7a + 6b = 7(25) + 6(-25) = 175 - 150 = 25 ] Thus, gcd(25, 4200) = 25, and the fraction reduces to frac{25}{4200} = frac{1}{168}. The final answer is boxed{168}.

Released under the Turing License.

has loaded