question:请将“Iber bringt dieses Problem auf den Begriff, wenn er von „einer grundlegenden Voraussetzung“ des Hegelschen Systems spricht, die das Herz des Systems ausmacht. „Diese Voraussetzung“, so fährt Iber fort, „besteht darin, daß die Wirklichkeit, sei es die natürliche oder die geistige durch idealen Strukturen bestimmt ist, die der geistigen und natürlichen Realität noch vorausliegen“ (1990, S. 8). Und, so schlussfolgert er: „Es ist diese Voraussetzung, die Hegel gemeinsam mit Platon macht und die den absoluten Idealismus seines Systems begründet“ (ebd.).105 Dieser Anspruch des Begriffs - der den idealistischen Systemen Hegels und Platons gemeinsam ist - ist es, der nach Marx den logischen Pantheismus bzw. die Mystifikation ausmacht. Es kommt primär nicht darauf an, die Wirklichkeit zu erforschen, ihre innerliche, notwendige Zusammenhänge aufzuspüren, um sie dann begrifflich darzustellen, die „Verarbeitung von Anschauung und Vorstellung in Begriffe“ (MEGA2 II.1/1, S. 37; MEW 42, S. 36)106, also das Denken aus dem Gegenstand bzw. die Logik der Sache zu entwickeln, sondern die Bildung der Einheit der Darstellung ist schon am Beginn unterstellt, und zwar weil der Sache der Logik, dem abstrakten Begriff und seinen Bestimmungen gefolgt wird.107 Das Problem, das sich an dieser Stelle auftut, ist das Problem des Verhältnisses von Logik und Realphilosophie bzw. wie die wissenschaftliche Erklärung an die Sache heranzugehen hat. Marx’ Einwand gegen Hegel ist, dass bei Hegel, wie aus der zitierten Passage der Enzyklopädie deutlich wird, der Logik (dem logischen Begriff) der Vorrang zugeschrieben wird, also dass die Wirklichkeit bzw. die bestehenden Zustände aus der logischen Idee erklärt werden müssen, und zwar weil sich in ihnen die logische Idee verwirklicht hat, so dass jetzt derart eine Identität zwischen Vernunft und Wirklichkeit besteht, dass man die Wirklichkeit erkennen kann, nicht weil man sie mit angemessenen methodischen Mitteln behandelt, sondern einfach, weil sie vernünftig ist bzw. weil der Begriff sich in ihr realisiert hat. tin Hintergrund dieser Umkehrung steht die These der Versubjekti- vierung der logischen Idee, die „nach einem bestimmten Princip und zu bestimmter Absicht handle“ (MEGA2 1/2, S. 7; MEW 1, S. 205), i.e. es sind die Bestimmungen des logischen Begriffs, die der Darstellung des Staates vorangestellt werden, so dass der Staat vermittels der Idee bzw. des Begriffs aus dem vorausgesetzten Staatsmaterial entstehen kann. „Die Seele der Gegenstände, hier des Staats, ist fertig, prädestinirt vor ihrem Körper, der eigentlich nur Schein ist“ (MEGA2 1/2, S. 15; MEW 1, S. 213). Dagegen hebt Marx als „Basen“ des Staates die „wirklichen Subjekten“ (MEGA2 1/2, S. 24; MEW 1, S. 224) hervor (gemeint sind Familie und bürgerliche Gesellschaft), die dann im Staat ihre soziale Qualität objektivieren. Zu bemerken ist allerdings, dass die Versubjektivierung der Idee nicht der Existenz der empirischen Zustände zuwiderläuft, dass also Hegel in der Realphilosophiem nicht bloß über Gedankendinge redet. Er beschäftigt sich tatsächlich mit der Sache, aber nur insofern sie als ein Resultat der Entwicklung der Idee ausgesprochen wird bzw. im Zuge der Begriffslogik entwickelt wird, was, wie sich entlang dieser Arbeit noch zeigen wird, nicht selten bedeutet, dass eine unkritische Aufnahme bestehender Zustände vorgenommen wird und diese zugleich als Ausdruck von Vernunftwahrheiten behauptet werden. Was sich diesen nicht anpasst, gleichsam das Übermaß der Sache, bleibt einfach dahingestellt, ohne dass die Konsequenzen für die übrigen Teile des Systems überprüft werden. Besonders wichtig und erhellend ist, was diesen Punkt betrifft, die Theorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft - auf die später noch näher eingegangen wird. Arndt spricht mit Recht davon, dass „die Behandlung der Ökonomie von Seiten der Realphilosophie auf einen Nerv, vielleicht sogar den Nerv der Hegelschen Systemkonzeption weist“ (1989, S. 315).109 Und zwar, so wird sich noch herausstellen, aufgrund der Konsequenzen, die Hegels mangelhafte Behandlung der modernen Ökonomie für seine Staatskonzeption hat, die nicht auf die rückständige historische Lage Deutschlands zurückzuführen ist, sondern eine unmittelbare Konsequenz der Struktur des Systems sind, die ihren Kern im Übergang des Begriffs zur Objektivität hat.110 Wie Lassalle (GRS 6, S.41 - 42) in triftiger Weise anmerkt, gibt dieser Übergang den Maßstab für die Entwicklung der Geschichte als Selbstverwirklichung des Begriffes bzw. des Geistes ab. Marx beleuchtet die Konsequenzen des Hegelschen methodischen Ansatzes, insbesondere das Umschlagen des Idealismus in einen unkritischen Empirismus in Bezug auf die Trennung von bürgerlicher Gesellschaft und Staat, und zwar indem er die Frage nach dem Grund dieser Trennung stellt. Marx zufolge hat Flegel, wie gesehen, „die Trennung der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft und des politischen Staat (einen modernen Zustand) vorausgesetzt und als nothwendiges Moment der Idee entwickelt; als absolute Vernunftwahrheit“ (MEGA2 1/2, S. 79 - 80; MEW 1, S. 277).111 Ein bestehender, empirischer Zustand wird aufgenommen - nicht wirklich erklärt, z.B. was den Widerspruch der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft und des politischen Staates ausmacht - und trotzdem als Wahrheit in der Idee ausgesprochen, die durch ihn zu sich selbst zurückkehrt. Nur aus der Tatsache, dass eine Trennung aus der Logik der Idee (Allgemein- heit/Besonderheit) entwickelt wird, weiß man von der Sache her noch nicht, was diese Trennung ausmacht - der Hinweis auf die differentia spe- cifica fehlt bzw. warum sich bürgerliche Gesellschaft und Staat wegen ihren jeweiligen Zweckbestimmungen trennen müssen.112 Insofern Hegel aber die Wirklichkeit aus der Idee erläutert bzw. herauskonstruiert, reicht es, wenn die Empirie theoretisch als der Idee angemessen ausgesprochen wird. Weil es, so Marx, „nur darum zu thun ist, irgendeiner empirischen Existenz die Bedeutung der Verwirklichung der Idee beizulegen, so versteht es sich, daß diese Gefässe ihre Bestimmungen erfüllt haben, sobald sie zu einer bestimmten Incorporation eines Lebensmomentes der Idee geworden sind“ (MEGA21/2, S. 43; MEW 1, S. 241). Als Gefäße der Bestimmungen der Idee gelten also die Familie, bürgerliche Gesellschaft und Staat insofern, als sie als „Bestimmungen der Idee, der Substanz als Subjekt“ (ebd.) auftreten. Diese These ist es, die Marx veranlasst zu sagen: „Nicht die Rechts-philosophie, sondern die Logik ist das wahre Interesse. Nicht daß das Denken sich in politischen Bestimmungen verkörpert, sondern daß die vorhandenen politischen Bestimmungen in abstrakte Gedanken verflüchtigt werden, ist die philosophische Arbeit“ (MEGA2 1/2, S. 18; MEW 1, S. 216). „Es kommt nur darauf an“, so Marx, „für die einzelnen, konkreten Bestimmungen die entsprechenden abstrakten aufzufinden“ (MEGA2 1/2, S. 11; MEW 1, S. 209). Es wird also eine empirische, geschichtliche Tatsache aufgenommen, wie sie tatsächlich der Fall in der Moderne ist, z.B. die Trennung von bürgerlicher Gesellschaft und Staat, die man dann gemäß den Bestimmungen des Begriffs rekonstruiert. Diese Prozedur trifft tatsächlich die Sache, die Hegel betreibt. Marx’ Kritik verkennt aber nicht die Fortschritte in Hegels Behandlung der modernen geistigen Welt und spricht sie auch ausdrücklich aus, wenn er behauptet: Man hat Hegel vielfach angegriffen über seine Entwicklung der Moral. Er hat nichts gethan als die Moral des modernen Staates und des modernen Privatrechts entwickelt. Man hat die Moral mehr vom Staat trennen, mehr emancipieren wollen! Was hat man damit bewiesen? Daß die Trennung des jetzigen Staates von der Moral moralisch ist, daß die Moral unstaatlich und der Staat unmoralisch ist. Es ist vielmehr ein grosses, obgleich nach der Seite hin (nämlich nach der Seite hin, daß Hegel den Staat, der eine solche Moral zur Voraussetzung hat, für die reale Idee der Sittlichkeit ausgibt) unbewußtes Verdienst Hegels, der modernen Moral ihre wahre Stellung angewiesen zu haben (MEGA2 1/2, S. 118; MEW 1, S. 313).”翻译为中文

question:import java.util.*; /** * Your implementation of various different graph algorithms. * * @author Royce Arockiasamy * @userid rarockiasamy6 * @GTID 903754593 * @version 1.0 */ public class GraphAlgorithms { /** * Performs a breadth first search (bfs) on the input graph, starting at * the parameterized starting vertex. * * When exploring a vertex, explore in the order of neighbors returned by * the adjacency list. Failure to do so may cause you to lose points. * * You may import/use java.util.Set, java.util.List, java.util.Queue, and * any classes that implement the aforementioned interfaces, as long as they * are efficient. * * The only instance of java.util.Map that you may use is the * adjacency list from graph. DO NOT create new instances of Map * for BFS (storing the adjacency list in a variable is fine). * * DO NOT modify the structure of the graph. The graph should be unmodified * after this method terminates. * * @param <T> the generic typing of the data * @param start the vertex to begin the bfs on * @param graph the graph to search through * @return list of vertices in visited order * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any input is null, or if start * doesn't exist in the graph */ public static <T> List<Vertex<T>> bfs(Vertex<T> start, Graph<T> graph) { if (start == null || graph == null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Start vertex or graph is null"); } if (!graph.getAdjList().containsKey(start)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Start vertex doesn't exist in the graph"); } Set<Vertex<T>> visited = new HashSet<>(); List<Vertex<T>> vertices = new ArrayList<>(); Queue<Vertex<T>> queue = new LinkedList<>(); queue.add(start); visited.add(start); while (!queue.isEmpty()) { Vertex<T> curr = queue.poll(); vertices.add(curr); for (VertexDistance<T> adj : graph.getAdjList().get(curr)) { if (!visited.contains(adj.getVertex())) { queue.add(adj.getVertex()); visited.add(adj.getVertex()); } } } return vertices; } /** * Performs a depth first search (dfs) on the input graph, starting at * the parameterized starting vertex. * * When exploring a vertex, explore in the order of neighbors returned by * the adjacency list. Failure to do so may cause you to lose points. * * *NOTE* You MUST implement this method recursively, or else you will lose * all points for this method. * * You may import/use java.util.Set, java.util.List, and * any classes that implement the aforementioned interfaces, as long as they * are efficient. * * The only instance of java.util.Map that you may use is the * adjacency list from graph. DO NOT create new instances of Map * for DFS (storing the adjacency list in a variable is fine). * * DO NOT modify the structure of the graph. The graph should be unmodified * after this method terminates. * * @param <T> the generic typing of the data * @param start the vertex to begin the dfs on * @param graph the graph to search through * @return list of vertices in visited order * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any input is null, or if start * doesn't exist in the graph */ public static <T> List<Vertex<T>> dfs(Vertex<T> start, Graph<T> graph) { if (start == null || graph == null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Start vertex or graph is null"); } if (!graph.getAdjList().containsKey(start)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Start vertex not in graph"); } List<Vertex<T>> list = new ArrayList<>(); Set<Vertex<T>> visited = new HashSet<>(); rDfs(start, graph, list, visited); return list; } /** * helper method for the dfs algorithm. * @param start dfs starts on this node * @param graph graph consisting of all the nodes * @param visited set to keep track of visited nodes * @param list vertices list */ private static <T> void rDfs(Vertex<T> start, Graph<T> graph, List<Vertex<T>> list, Set<Vertex<T>> visited) { visited.add(start); list.add(start); for (VertexDistance<T> adj : graph.getAdjList().get(start)) { if (!visited.contains(adj.getVertex())) { rDfs(adj.getVertex(), graph, list, visited); } } } /** * Finds the single-source shortest distance between the start vertex and * all vertices given a weighted graph (you may assume non-negative edge * weights). * * Return a map of the shortest distances such that the key of each entry * is a node in the graph and the value for the key is the shortest distance * to that node from start, or Integer.MAX_VALUE (representing * infinity) if no path exists. * * You may import/use java.util.PriorityQueue, * java.util.Map, and java.util.Set and any class that * implements the aforementioned interfaces, as long as your use of it * is efficient as possible. * * You should implement the version of Dijkstra's where you use two * termination conditions in conjunction. * * 1) Check if all of the vertices have been visited. * 2) Check if the PQ is empty. * * DO NOT modify the structure of the graph. The graph should be unmodified * after this method terminates. * * @param <T> the generic typing of the data * @param start the vertex to begin the Dijkstra's on (source) * @param graph the graph we are applying Dijkstra's to * @return a map of the shortest distances from start to every * other node in the graph * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any input is null, or if start * doesn't exist in the graph. */ public static <T> Map<Vertex<T>, Integer> dijkstras(Vertex<T> start, Graph<T> graph) { if (start == null || graph == null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Start vertex or graph is null"); } if (!graph.getVertices().contains(start)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Start vertex not in graph"); } Set<Vertex<T>> visited = new HashSet<>(); Map<Vertex<T>, Integer> weights = new HashMap<>(); PriorityQueue<VertexDistance<T>> priorityQueue = new PriorityQueue<>(); VertexDistance<T> starter = new VertexDistance<>(start, 0); priorityQueue.add(starter); for (Vertex<T> vertex : graph.getVertices()) { weights.put(vertex, Integer.MAX_VALUE); } int dist = 0; while (!(priorityQueue.isEmpty()) && visited.size() < graph.getVertices().size()) { VertexDistance<T> pointer = priorityQueue.poll(); if (!visited.contains(pointer.getVertex())) { dist = pointer.getDistance(); visited.add(pointer.getVertex()); weights.put(pointer.getVertex(), dist); } for (VertexDistance<T> vertex : graph.getAdjList().get(pointer.getVertex())) { if (!visited.contains(vertex.getVertex())) { VertexDistance<T> temp = new VertexDistance<>(vertex.getVertex(), dist + vertex.getDistance()); priorityQueue.add(temp); } } } return weights; } /** * Runs Prim's algorithm on the given graph and returns the Minimum * Spanning Tree (MST) in the form of a set of Edges. If the graph is * disconnected and therefore no valid MST exists, return null. * * You may assume that the passed in graph is undirected. In this framework, * this means that if (u, v, 3) is in the graph, then the opposite edge * (v, u, 3) will also be in the graph, though as a separate Edge object. * * The returned set of edges should form an undirected graph. This means * that every time you add an edge to your return set, you should add the * reverse edge to the set as well. This is for testing purposes. This * reverse edge does not need to be the one from the graph itself; you can * just make a new edge object representing the reverse edge. * * You may assume that there will only be one valid MST that can be formed. * * You should NOT allow self-loops or parallel edges in the MST. * * You may import/use PriorityQueue, java.util.Set, and any class that * implements the aforementioned interface. * * DO NOT modify the structure of the graph. The graph should be unmodified * after this method terminates. * * The only instance of java.util.Map that you may use is the * adjacency list from graph. DO NOT create new instances of Map * for this method (storing the adjacency list in a variable is fine). * * @param <T> the generic typing of the data * @param start the vertex to begin Prims on * @param graph the graph we are applying Prims to * @return the MST of the graph or null if there is no valid MST * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any input is null, or if start * doesn't exist in the graph. */ public static <T> Set<Edge<T>> prims(Vertex<T> start, Graph<T> graph) { if (start == null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("The start vertex is null"); } if (graph == null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("The graph is null"); } if (!graph.getVertices().contains(start)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("The start is not in the graph"); } Set<Vertex<T>> visited = new HashSet<>(); Set<Edge<T>> edgeSet = new HashSet<>(); PriorityQueue<Edge<T>> pq = new PriorityQueue<>(); Map<Vertex<T>, List<VertexDistance<T>>> adjList = graph.getAdjList(); for (VertexDistance<T> v : adjList.get(start)) { Edge<T> curr = new Edge<>(start, v.getVertex(), v.getDistance()); pq.add(curr); } visited.add(start); while (!pq.isEmpty() && visited.size() < graph.getVertices().size()) { Edge<T> curr = pq.poll(); if (!visited.contains(curr.getV())) { visited.add(curr.getV()); Edge<T> edge = new Edge<>(curr.getU(), curr.getV(), curr.getWeight()); edgeSet.add(edge); Edge<T> edge1 = new Edge<>(curr.getV(), curr.getU(), curr.getWeight()); edgeSet.add(edge1); for (VertexDistance<T> vx : adjList.get(curr.getV())) { if (!visited.contains(vx.getVertex())) { Edge<T> pointer = new Edge<>(curr.getV(), vx.getVertex(), vx.getDistance()); pq.add(pointer); } } } } if (edgeSet.size() < graph.getVertices().size() - 1) { return null; } return edgeSet; } } correct the code for prim's algorithm and only gimme code for that

question:Write a descriptive, fictional, imaginative concept level list for a sequel to this game set 1000 years after the first one. "AT HELL'S GATE LORE TIMELINE (REDUX) [[4/13/24]] PART 1: "Prelude to the postlude." # [WWIII] !!PROTO-CATACLYSM!! 2034 - In a world shackled by economic strife, political instability, and growing concerns over the climate of the future, tensions rise across the globe, primarily in Eastern Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. 2035 - These tensions later escalate into the war that will, unbeknownst to mankind, end all wars, (at least on Earth). 2037 - WWIII begins, with combat and warfare escalating all over the world, from the snowy fortresses of Alaska to the deserted minefields of the Sahara. 2042 - About 5 years into what seems like will be a never-ending war, North Korea finally makes good on decades of nuclear brinkmanship. Major cities around the world, London, Washington D.C., Tokyo, are all engulfed in a hellish blaze of atomic waste. 2042 - NATO decides to retaliate, launching nuclear missiles on major strategic and population centers of the enemy side as well. Almost halving the human population alive at the time. 2044 - To add insult to injury, a plague begins developing. with incurable effects and very resilient viruses, there is very little hope for humanity. 2050 - As of 1/1/2050, less than 1/3 of the original population of Earth at its peak in 2038 are still alive. (not counting those dead from natural causes). 2054 - Global resources being strained and very little population leads to the remaining factions and nations of Earth to call a temporary detente in order to get back together and hopefully keep mankind from becoming extinct. # [In their hopelessness, the spires rose.] 2055 - This period of hopelessness soons marks the beginning of a resurgence in religion, leading mankind to construct "doomspires", towering temples of multi-colored bricks to appease God. [[There are no further information markers in the records until 2099.]] PART 2: "What hath God wrought?" # [Signs of the rapture.] 9/14/2099 - On 16:57:53 UTC precisely, the solar eclipse then occurring over North America heralded the beginning of the end, as the few spectators viewed the day turn to night, the thundering roar of a divine horn was heard across the world, traveling faster than the speed of light. 12/11/2099 - A strange celestial object, unknown to man until its striking of the Earth, splashes down in the middle of the Atlantic, seas turn blood red and toxic. Another trumpet sounds. # ["7" years of trial.] (2100-2105) !!FIRST CATACLYSM!! During this period, various cataclysmic events are endowed upon the Earth, with each new disaster, another trumpet sounds. # [Discovery of the fallibility of the divine.] 7/8/2103 - The remnants of a scientific research camp in Antarctica come across a strange monolithic structure in the freezing wastes, inscripted upon it is the first "revelation", presumed to be from God himself. This sparks debate in society over their God's possible fallibility. # [Even the brightest light will burn out one day.] 8/27/2105 - Suddenly, without any notification, no previous indication, no fanfare, no cataclysmic event, God vanishes. We are alone. # [Orphans of the father.] 2105-2117 Now that mankind is truly alone, humanity must fend for survival with the very few resources that are available. Demons and lost angels run rampant on the earth, so there is only one thing we must do- 2110 - The plan for constructing a massive spacecraft in order to transport humanity's remnants is developed, it is called "The Exodus", and will take to the stars in 2117. 2117 - Luckily for man, all goes well, and the remnants of mankind takes to the stars and establishes settlements on the inner planets and some on moons of the outer planets. PART 3: "Let me play among the stars." # [The Second Exodus] 2117 - With Earth left an irradiated, apocalypse ravaged ruin, The Exodus departs carrying about 500,000 humans, leaving millions on Earth to fend for themselves. 2118 - The first humans reach the inner planets, Mars, Venus, Mercury, etc... 2127 - The last humans to settle the Solar System arrive at moons of the outer planets. # [Development of new cultures and religions in the planets and moons (as of 2130)] Mercury - largely uninhabited, mostly focused on industry and mining. Venus - Cultural center of the inner planets, vast floating cities consisting of inter-connected zeppelins. This cultural paradise leads them to begin the development of a new religion called "Infernism" (more on that later) Earth - Virtually abandoned, few settlements are located here, with most suffering in a hell on Earth. Mars - Less culturally focused but more inhabited than Venus, Mars also develops a religion "Deusvultism (crucifiers)", centered around the idea that God has not abandoned Man, and is just testing their fortitude. Europa - Underwater cities under the ice caps, military capital of the Solar System. Titan - Home of the most populated city in the Solar System, and location of the Capitol of mankind. Uranus and beyond - vastly unpopulated, although plans are being made to create a self-sustaining ark that could travel to the farthest reaches of the Solar System and beyond, possibly into deep space and other star systems. # [The Third (failed) Exodus] After departing from Titan in 2134 in hopes of finding habitable locations beyond the known Solar System, scans revealed there were none within thousands of light years, dimming hope for humanity's future if disaster were ever to befall them yet again. It is believed everyone on board died (40,000) after losing contact with the ship in 2178. M_717 — 04/13/2024 3:36 PM PART 4: "SEA OF OFFAL AND ASHES" # [A cold war] (2135-2174) This period marked the first true peace in centuries, after decades of despair, things finally seemed like they would soon be going man's way. But war is one of the grim truths of reality. # [The twins] Infernism - Infernism, spawned from the zeppelin-cities of Venus, was a religion centered around worshipping a deity called Baphomet. Founded by a supposedly schizophrenic elder trying to rekindle the flames of hope in a world of despair. The Baphomet that the Infernists worship is unrelated to the Baphomet of the old world, and the name is generally understood to be spouted from the founder's mentally ill mind. The Infernists glorify violence, taking heed from a vision the elder had. Deusvultism - Similarly, Deusvultism also arose from the need for hope in trying times, but is more grounded in reality. The belief holds central the idea that God has not abandoned humanity, but is just testing them to see if humanity is capable of maintaining fortitude in their belief after straying so far from His light. However, many Deusvultists are also heavily fanatical, in stark contrast to their beliefs. Both religions hold a reputation of being very violent and fanatical, Infernists as part of their belief system, and Deusvultists as the members personalities. # [Twin Crusades] (2174-2204) !!SECOND CATACLYSM!! 2174 - After tensions between the Infernists and the Deusvultists start running hot, each faction declares holy war on each other. [MOST HISTORICAL RECORDS HAVE BEEN LOST DURING THIS TIME PERIOD] 2204 - Both sides are exhausted of resources, and constant war and desolation has lead the inner planets to run dry of resources, this is considered to be the second cataclysm of man, following the first, the rapture, 100 years prior. M_717 — 04/13/2024 6:55 PM PART 5: "Hundred year silence" # [The long night.] (2204-2264) 2204 - The two factions decide to sign a ceasefire after depletion of inner planet resources, motivation, and morale. Each agree to live in isolation and live as their own entities. 2214 - A massive solar flare renders all electronic devices and tools incapable for use in space, trading stops as well as communication between nations, the period of isolation has begun. Not much else happens during this time period, aside from a few successions of leaders or natural events. # [Glorified loneliness.] 2264-2301 After the effects of the solar flare wore off, the populace of humanity decided to stay isolated. The reasons behind this were that they believed they should live a peaceful life for the rest of eternity, or at least until the sun died. [THERE IS NOTHING ELSE IMPORTANT OF NOTE] M_717 — 04/13/2024 7:26 PM PART 6: "AT HELL'S GATE" # [Refugees from beyond.] In the late 2280s, supposedly hyper-evolved humans, descendants of those that arose to paradise but then were abandoned by God arrive in the solar system through rifts in the space-time fabric. They incorporate with the already established factions. # [The deity's message] 1/1/2301 - With the final curtain call of man, people dying out, nations crumbling, falling, and dying before the universe's eyes, mankind must prepare for one last performance. A sudden signal originating from Pluto is broadcasted across the Solar System. It's message personalized for anyone that receives it, causing each and every human to believe they are "the chosen one", and must go on an odyssey to pluto in order to gain salvation. 1/1/2301 to 2308 - Many die or fail in the struggle to reach Pluto, it is every man for himself, a frenzy unlike any seen in decades. In this struggle's center is ODYSSEUS {placeholder name}, the protagonist of the game's story. # [The deity's odyssey] Odysseus ventures through the planets, encountering original characters, traversing original locations, and finding secrets and lore snippets. At Pluto, he comes face to face with the deity, this deity takes the form of a colossal, almost dream-like serpent towering over mountains. [WILL NEED TO THINK MORE ABOUT THE ENDING] !!THIRD CATACLYSM!!" "AT HELL'S GATE LEVEL LIST (REDUX) # SUN # [0] (Unlocked after completing {I-I} "Let there be **FIGHT**" {0} A Burning Memory (entrance to Battlefield of Babel) # MERCURY # [I] {I} “Let there be **FIGHT**” {II} “Sword Fight on the Heights” {III} “The Mentor” (boss battle) {IV} “The Mercury Nexus” (Space Station) # VENUS # [II] {I} “Acid's reign” {II} “Zeppelin Wars” {III} “Lovely Bastards” (boss battle) {IV} “Infernal cradle” (Space Station) # EARTH # [III] {I} “Paradise Lost” {II} “Revelation's echoes” {III} “Their Former Eden” (boss battle) {IV} “Fly me to the Moon” (Lunar Station) # MARS # [IV] {I} “God of War” {II} “War of the Worlds” {III} “Ozymandias” (boss battle) {IV} “Martian Bastion” (Space Station) # EUROPA # [V] {I} “潜水艦戦争” {II} “Frozen Neon” {III} “Great Red Spot” (boss battle) {IV} “By Jove!” (Space Station) # TITAN # [VI] {I} “The Capitol” {II} “Methane Sea” {III} “Crossroads” (boss battle) {IV} “The Titanic” (Space Station) # PLUTO # [VII] {I} “Abandon All Hope” {II} “Twin Moons” {III} “Calm Before The Storm” (no enemies) {IV} “AT HELL’S GATE” (final boss)"

question:jquery获取某元素最近的另一个select元素